Has Amazon Missed the AI Assistant Boat?

I’ve been reflecting on Amazon’s approach to AI, and it’s baffling. While OpenAI and Microsoft have taken the industry by storm with ChatGPT, Amazon seems to be missing in action. They’re not developing their own chat generative AI solution but instead are focusing on being the foundation infrastructure for companies like Anthropic. This makes some sense, but they also have their own foundation models, like Titan, that could power an impressive chatbot.

The most perplexing part is Amazon’s massive market penetration with Alexa devices. Alexa is arguably the dumbest AI tool out there right now. It’s limited to very specific commands like “play music” or “what’s the weather.” Integrating a generative AI model like Titan could revolutionize Alexa, making it a powerful assistant capable of handling a wide range of tasks, like adding events to calendars and managing daily activities.

Amazon has the infrastructure and the market reach—Alexa is in cars, homes, and on mobile devices. Yet, they haven’t made the leap to enhance Alexa with advanced AI. It’s a huge missed opportunity. With the right AI integration, Alexa could be so much more than a glorified voice-activated remote. It could become an indispensable part of our daily lives.

So why hasn’t Amazon taken this step? What’s the logic behind holding back on such a promising advancement? It’s a question worth pondering as we watch other tech giants push the boundaries of AI.

Albert Camus’ The Plague

I remember when I read Albert Camus’ “The Plague” I found myself deeply engrossed. Camus quickly became a favorite. His storytelling in The Plague is both compelling and stressful, detailing a ten-month outbreak of the bubonic plague in a 1940s town in Algiers.

The narrative feels almost like a zombie apocalypse. The residents are trapped in the town, facing the grim reality of a painful death. Cut off from the outside world and separated from some of their loved ones, the story dives into the motivations behind people’s actions during such a crisis. Camus doesn’t shy away from questioning God, his followers, and the meaning of life itself. He raises profound questions—does any of it really matter?

Camus’ exploration of human nature under extreme duress is both thought-provoking and unsettling. “The Plague” isn’t just a tale of disease and death; it reflects the human condition, our resilience, and the philosophical questions that arise when we’re pushed to our limits.

Ironically enough, the book could not prepare me or anyone for what we endured as a civilization during the COVID lockdowns.

Heartbreak

In his book Consolations, the poet David Whyte defines heartbreak as unpreventable, the natural outcome of caring for people and things over which we have no control. He says that heartbreak begins when we are asked to let go but cannot. Heartbreak is how we mature.

He recommends we look for and befriend it because it is unavoidable. There is no alternative path.

Whyte’s description of the word is truthful and empowering. It moves the word from a position of weakness and frailty to one of somberness, respect, and acceptance. Knowing you’ve reached such a point means that what has asked you to let go is truly meaningful, and your love is real because only such conditions would result in heartbreak.

I also like that it can take so many forms: children, work, arts, and relationships.

Moral Decadence: Lessons from 1920s Berlin

A recent post on X sparked a thought-provoking discussion: Did the depravity and hedonism of 1920s Berlin pave the way for the rise of the Nazi movement in Germany? While it’s impossible to attribute such a complex historical event to a single cause, my history study suggests that extreme moral decadence often leads to societal “over-corrections.”

When a society indulges excessively in hedonism, sexual depravity, and exploitation, it begins to destabilize. This instability opens the door for necessary corrections. Societies, like all complex systems, strive for equilibrium. If they fail to self-correct through the leadership of cultural and political figures, they will inevitably do so through conflicts and upheavals.

Certain moral principles are universally valued across societies: honesty and truthfulness, integrity, respect for human dignity, compassion and concern for others’ well-being, fairness and justice, and responsibility and accountability for one’s actions. A common thread among these principles is self-control. Without self-control, societies descend into chaos.

Berlin in the 1920s serves as a stark example. The city’s descent into debauchery and depravity was shocking. Even when consensual, many acts violated these fundamental principles.

Prostitution and other sexual fetishes, even when practiced by consenting adults, can pose serious threats to society, culture, and the individuals involved. These practices can lead to exploitation, abuse, and trauma and exacerbate pre-existing mental health issues. Participation in such activities can result in addiction, unhealthy coping mechanisms, social stigmatization, difficulty forming healthy relationships, and the destruction of the family unit.

While consenting adults have the right to engage in sexual practices of their choice, we must consider the potential psychological, emotional, and societal consequences, especially for vulnerable individuals with mental health issues.

Ultimately, self-control and adherence to moral principles are paramount for the stability and success of any society. Without them, we risk repeating past mistakes, inviting turmoil into our lives, and destroying our societies.

Progress

Reflecting on the technological advancements of the past fifty-one years is nothing short of astonishing. When the United States landed a spacecraft on the moon, it was guided by a 70-pound computer that could perform 14,245 calculations per second. That was cutting-edge technology at the time. 

Today, Nvidia has introduced a graphics processor that is over 2.5 billion times faster and weighs little more than a book. The sheer scale of this improvement is difficult to grasp. 

Consider data storage: during the Apollo era, storing a terabyte of data would have cost an astronomical $1.7 billion in today’s dollars. Now, you can get that same storage capacity for just over $15. This drastic reduction in cost has revolutionized how we handle and store information.

The advancements don’t stop there. In August, researchers achieved a breakthrough by pushing data through a single fiber-optic cable at a staggering rate of 178 terabits per second. This speed is enough to transfer approximately 1,500 4K movies in the time it takes to say “one, Mississippi.” 

It’s remarkable to think that when the Apollo 11 astronauts returned to Earth, the concept of computer-to-computer communication was still in its infancy. The first such link, known as Arpanet, came three months later.

These technological leaps showcase the incredible pace of innovation. They also make us wonder: if we’ve come this far in just over fifty years, what marvels will the next fifty hold? The possibilities are endless, and the future is bound to be filled with even more astonishing advancements. Assuming we don’t destroy ourselves of course.

“Trust In Science” Betrayed: The Conflict of Interest Eroding Scientific Institutions

The New York Post reported today that the National Institutes of Health (NIH) and its scientists collected a staggering $710 million in royalties during the pandemic from late 2021 through 2023. These payments were made by private companies, primarily pharmaceuticals, to license medical innovations from government scientists. Astonishingly, $690 million of that amount went to the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Disease (NIAID), the subagency led by Dr. Anthony Fauci, and 260 of its scientists.

This information is deeply unsettling. Like many of my generation, I always believed in the integrity of science. It was a domain we felt we could trust. Why isn’t this news everywhere? Why hasn’t it sparked outrage across political divides? The lack of coverage suggests a deeper issue within the media. It seems mainstream media outlets have been compromised for decades and act more as mouthpieces for the establishment rather than independent watchdogs.

This situation also underscores a broader issue: the illusion of a two-party system. Despite the apparent differences and constant bickering between Republicans and Democrats, we deal with a single-party system. A system focused on consolidating power and keeping the populace distracted by fostering divisions along gender, race, and religious lines.

The system is corrupt and we need to change it before there is nothing to salvage.

A Divided House

Yesterday, May 30th, marked a historic and troubling day in American history. Donald J. Trump was found guilty on over 30 counts, officially making him a felon. While the left is busy celebrating, I believe we’ve just witnessed the opening shots of the second American Civil War. This isn’t about Trump; it’s about a profound disconnect in our society, where any dissent is met with accusations of racism and bigotry. The left has forced every piece of nonsense down our throats — men can be women, Hamas are freedom fighters — and now has taken our country to the brink of becoming a Banana Republic.

“A house divided against itself cannot stand. I believe this government cannot endure, permanently half slave and half free.”

Abraham Linclon

This is not about Donald Trump. His potential victory won’t save us; it will only drag us further into chaos. Trump, undoubtedly, will seek vengeance, and while he might be justified, it sets a dangerous precedent. This is how our nation will operate moving forward, weaponizing the justice system against all political opponents. A second Civil War is the only way to avoid this grim fate. Accepting the state of a Banana Republic is no better than enduring the dystopian communist nightmare we currently face with the present administration.

Adding to the chaos, under the cover of night, our President Biden authorized Ukraine to use American weapons to strike deep into Russia. This move dangerously escalates tensions and brings us closer to a direct conflict with the world’s second-largest nuclear power. It feels like a nightmare that I can’t wake up from, yet it’s all too real. A reckoning is inevitable; if it doesn’t come, God help us all.

The Dream

A few weeks back, I had one of the most vivid and symbolic dreams I’ve ever experienced. It started with a bust of a head that kept changing and morphing into different faces. The transformation was continuous, showing a myriad of expressions and identities. This mysterious figure, somehow, seemed to be my guide. It told me to “ask my dove” in response to a question I had about what was going on in the dream. 

The setting of the dream was particularly striking, everything appeared gray and dull. It was reminiscent of the film, “Brazil,” by Terry Gilliam, which portrays a dystopian world tangled in bureaucratic and authoritarian absurdity. Amidst this dullness, there was a simple bench, which seemed to offer a moment of rest from the grayness enveloping me.

As the dream continued, I found myself walking and talking with my 23-year-old son in a desert, likely one of the American deserts. The barren landscape around us echoed the feelings of isolation and emptiness that the earlier settings had introduced. 

Suddenly, I was trying to find my Apple phone using my Apple Watch’s Find My Phone feature, but it didn’t work. Oddly enough, the face of the watch displayed a fish in a fishbowl instead of the usual interface.

The dream shifted to a rundown apartment where an Indian or Arab businessman came to visit a friend. The scenario shifted quickly as three kids, maybe local to the area, stole my phone. This added to my frustration in this dream.

When I woke up I quickly jotted down all of the above and went back to sleep.  Next morning I typed all the information I wrote and asked ChatGPT to provide me with an interpretation of the dream based on the imagery. 

Below is Chat GPT’s interpretation of dream:

This prompt evokes rich symbolism and can be interpreted on multiple layers. Each element you described can represent different concepts or emotions, and collectively, they contribute to a narrative that could reflect feelings of confusion, transition, and a search for clarity or meaning. Let’s break down the elements:

1. Bust of a head changing into different faces: This could symbolize identity, transformation, or the fluid nature of self-perception. It may represent your changing roles or identities in life, or perhaps uncertainty about your own identity or the identities of others around you.

2. Asking the dove: Doves are often symbols of peace, purity, or guidance in literary and mythological contexts. This element suggests seeking answers or guidance from a pure or peaceful source within yourself or in your environment.

3. Gray and dull setting, reminiscent of “Brazil” by Terry Gilliam: “Brazil” is a film known for criticizing bureaucratic, authoritarian society and its surreal, dystopian outlook. This reference may symbolize feelings of entrapment in a monotonous, oppressive environment or a struggle against a faceless system.

4. Bench: A bench might symbolize rest, waiting, or contemplation. Your narrative could represent a moment or place of reflection amid the chaos or dullness.

5. Walking and talking with your 23-year-old son in the desert: This imagery of a desert journey with your son can represent a passage through life’s challenges or barren periods, accompanied by someone important to you, possibly reflecting on life lessons or personal growth.

6. Apple phone and Apple watch, with the watch showing a fish in a fishbowl: Technology often symbolizes connection and communication. The malfunctioning aspect might suggest feelings of frustration or disconnectedness. The fish in a fishbowl on the watch face could represent feeling trapped or observed.

7. Rundown apartment, visit by an Indian or Arab businessman: This scene might suggest elements of cultural diversity or complexity, social interactions in unexpected or declining circumstances, and perhaps issues of trust or miscommunication.

8. Three kids stealing the phone: This can symbolize loss, the unexpected disruptions that life can bring, or a sense of being overwhelmed by uncontrollable elements, possibly younger generations or new technologies.

Interpretation of the Collection: Collectively, these elements weave a narrative of a journey or quest for understanding amidst uncertainty and transformation. The presence of different identities, the guidance from a pure source, a journey through a stark landscape with a loved one, and the frustrating search for communication tools that fail, all paint a picture of searching for meaning or stability in an ever-changing, often challenging world. The backdrop of dullness and systemic oppression from the film reference adds a layer of struggle against external forces or the environment.

This could reflect your personal journey, dealing with change, seeking guidance, and grappling with generational shifts or technological challenges. The overall feeling might be one of navigating through the complexities of life and identity, with moments of contemplation and sudden disruptions.

In retrospect, much of this seems spot on, at least to some degree or another. These AI systems and the enormous foundation of information make them a great and fun tool for learning from the unconscious imagery in our dreams. I will continue to post as I remember dreams and see if there is a theme.

Thoughts on AI, Sanctions, and TikTok

This morning, I read an article from the Financial Times concerning the profitability of generative AI for major cloud providers like Azure, Google, and AWS. Although Microsoft’s Azure reported about four billion dollars in revenue from generative AI this year, Amazon’s and Google’s silence raises questions about the actual profitability after considering the substantial capital expenditures required to support these technologies. The profitability and long-term impact of generative AI on these companies’ bottom lines remain uncertain despite the industry’s optimism.

Additionally, I read about the ongoing sanctions against Russia due to its actions in Ukraine. Contrary to some reports suggesting these measures are starting to significantly impact Vladimir Putin, I remain skeptical. With the war nearing its third year and Russia seemingly stronger and advancing, it’s hard to see the effectiveness of these sanctions. At times, it feels like some narratives in the media are more propagandistic than informative.

Lastly, I considered the implications of Congress’s ban on TikTok. As a libertarian, I’m inherently opposed to such governmental restrictions. The article highlighted the contrast between pragmatic and dictatorial approaches, particularly noting China’s selective pragmatism with companies like Tesla, and the U.S.’s shifting stance towards Chinese companies. This duality in policy underscores the complex dance of international relations and business.

Resilient Futures: Navigating Disaster Recovery and Business Continuity

Part One: Foundation of Resilience: Why Leadership Must Drive Disaster Preparedness

Over the last couple of years I’ve talked and written about the importance of leadership, specifically non-technical stakeholders, having a central role in developing a data strategy. Too often, organizations leave their data strategy in the hands of technical teams, leading to robust and comprehensive data solutions that do not meet the needs of the stakeholders. Well, there is another area of technology where non-technical leaders/stakeholders need to be as central in the decision-making process: disaster recovery and business continuity.

Disaster recovery and business continuity seem like old-school topics that have been solved ages ago, yet sadly, the number of organizations that don’t have a reliable plan is more than most of us would want to admit. Here are some statistics that should give any executive the chills:

  • According to a 2021 study by Computing Research, only 54% of organizations have documented disaster recovery plans in place.
  • Of the organizations that do have a disaster recovery plan, a shocking 7% never actually test or validate their plans. Additionally, half of them only test their plans once a year or less frequently.
  • A study by IBM found that 77% of organizations don’t have a cyber security incident response plan that applies to the entire organization.
  • Research by Gartner revealed that only 35% of small and midsize businesses have a comprehensive business continuity plan in place.

Often, when an executive from the C-suite is asked if their organization has a DR/BC plan, the response is “Yes.” But when you ask them about their Recovery Time Objective (RTO) or Recovery Point Objective (RPO), they have no idea.

I cannot stress enough how important it is for leadership, specifically the C-suite, to actively engage in knowing and understanding their organization’s disaster recovery and business continuity plans, and critically, their RPOs and RTOs.

C-suite executives, regardless of their technical expertise, must understand their organization’s Recovery Time Objective (RTO) and Recovery Point Objective (RPO) to make informed strategic decisions, mitigate risks, ensure compliance, and effectively collaborate with IT teams. By actively engaging in comprehending these critical metrics, executives demonstrate leadership and commitment to safeguarding their organization’s operations, reputation, and financial stability in the face of potential disasters.

With some context around the problem, lets do a quick review of the concepts and terminology.

Quick Review

Now, it is important to note that disaster recovery and business continuity are distinct concepts, but they are closely intertwined. Business continuity encompasses a broader scope, including strategies to keep operations running during and after a disruptive event, while disaster recovery focuses on restoring IT systems and data.

In the context of DR, the Recovery Point Objective (RPO) is a key metric in disaster recovery planning that defines the maximum amount of data loss an organization can tolerate in the event of a disruptive incident or disaster. And Recovery Time Objective (RTO) is the maximum acceptable amount of time for restoring a network, application, or system and regaining access to data after an unplanned disruption or disaster event.

So what is the role of the c-suite executive in DR/BC planning?

It is the responsibility of the C-suite to provide clear guidance and direction to the technical teams tasked with implementing the DR strategy. This guidance should focus on three critical areas. First, executive leadership must identify and prioritize the business-critical systems that require zero or near-zero downtime. These are the systems that are essential to the organization’s ability to function and generate revenue. Second, leadership must define the acceptable amount of data loss during an outage, known as the Recovery Point Objective (RPO). This metric helps technical teams determine the frequency and scope of data backups. Finally, executive leadership must determine the acceptable amount of downtime before restoring critical systems, known as the Recovery Time Objective (RTO). This metric guides the development of strategies to quickly restore systems and minimize the impact of an outage. By providing clear parameters around these three key areas, executive leadership empowers technical teams to prioritize systems and develop appropriate DR strategies that align with the organization’s overall business objectives.

Now, equipped with the engagement and guidance of the leadership team around the priority of critical systems,RPOs and RTOs, the technical team can develop a robust DR strategy that will inform the BC strategy.  And a case for the value of the cloud can be made effectively.

In part two I will discuss the value proposition of a cloud-based DR solution using services from Amazon Web Services (AWS).  And provide some ideas around chaos testing for continuous improvements, and continuous monitoring and testing.

From The News

Kronos Private Cloud Outage (2021)

In December 2021, workforce management company Kronos suffered a crippling ransomware attack that took down its private cloud services used by thousands of businesses globally.

  • The outage disrupted payroll, scheduling and other workforce management operations for numerous companies across multiple industries.
  • Some major customers like the City of Cleveland and the University of Florida had to revert to manual timekeeping processes.
  • Kronos was unable to restore services from backups for weeks due to the severity of the attack.

The incident highlighted the company’s lack of resilient DR capabilities and contingency planning for such a scenario.

Previously published on LinkedIn